ناکارآمدی علم دیپلماسی مرسوم

امروز: شنبه 103 اردیبهشت 1

در شورای روابط خارجی آمریکا شخص ریچارد هاس در مقابل ظریف قرار گرفت و با او مصاحبه کرد و این یعنی تیر آخر آمریکایی ها

ریچارد هاس طراح جنگ های مذهبی سی ساله در بین مسلمانان است یعنی چیزی شبیه آن چیزی که بین کاتولیک ها وپروتستان ها رخ داد

و حالا که با بدست گرفتن ابتکار عمل توسط سپاه قدس انقلابی و استراتژی های شخص قاسم سلیمانی بیشتر نقشه هایش نقش بر آب شده سعی می کند تناقض های قولی دیپلماسی دستگاه دیپلماسی کشور و فعلی سپاه قدس را نشان دهد و این کار را بخوبی انجام می دهد و ظریف برای رفع تناقض اقوال سپاه قدس را بیان می کند تا تناقض را بپوشاند خوب از ای جهت که این حرف ها از یک مسئول دیپلماسی کشور شنیده می شود جای خوشحال هست ولی نکته ای که هست این حرفها بر خلاف دیپلماسی است و از رییس دیپلماسی کشور قبیح است

چون دیپلماسی که برای ما نوشته اند شبیه آن چیزی است در قانون مطبوعات بریتانیا برای ما نوشته اند یعنی سر به راه بودن ما و پا نکردن در کفش آنها

و آنچه خودشان برای خودشان قائل اند آزادی به معنای بی حد و حصر آن است

لذا دکتر ظریف دارد خلاف علمش عمل می کند چون علمش جوابگوی globalization به معنای آمریکایی سازی جهان نمی باشد و لازم است علم ارتباط بین الملل به گونه ای نوشته شود که اسلامی به معنای واقعی کلمه باشد یعنی یار مظلوم و دشمن ظالم

امیرالمونین به امام حسن و امام حسین علیهما السلام سفارش فرمودند کونا للظالم خصما و للمظلوم عونا یعنی ظلم ستیزی بدون مرز یعنی خمینیسم بین الملل

سوالات ریچارد هاس از جواب های ظریف برای من مهم تره ولی سایت وزارت امور خارجه ایران سوالهای ریچارد رو سانسور کرده ولی سایت شورای روابط خارجی آمریکا سوالها رو هو آورده که خدمتتان عرضه می کنم تا پی به خباثت برادر ریچارد ببرید

1- HAASS: Well, good evening. Welcome to the Council on Foreign Relations. As you can see, sitting next to me is the foreign minister of Iran, Mohammad Javad Zarif. I’m Richard Haass. And I also want to welcome not just those of you in the room but those of you who are joining us through all means electronic and digital from around the country and around the world. Just to say, this meeting is on—O-N—the record, and the minister and I will talk for about half an hour, and then we’ll open it up to you, our members. At the end of the meeting, we’ve asked that the members stay in their seats until the minister is able to leave Peterson Hall.

Foreign Minister Zarif has been to the United States in his current capacity for four—over the four or five last years, you’ve been minister—

2- HAASS: —four years, many times. He was educated here, got his doctorate at the University of Denver, and he and I have worked together, one way or another, sometimes in parallel purposes, sometimes in cross-purposes, in government, and I would just say he is a consummate professional. And it is—we are very pleased to have him here. Timing could not be better given all that is going on in his part of the world and beyond.

As I said, I’ll start with a few questions, and then we’ll open up.

Mr. Minister, welcome to the Council on Foreign Relations.

3- HAASS: Let me just ask you a general question about the part of the world where your country resides. When you compare it to other regions—Asia, Latin America, Europe, even Africa—the Middle East has been, is, and promises to be the least stable geography in the world. Why is that? What is it about the Greater Middle East that makes it so instability-prone?

4- HAASS: Following up on that, the new crown prince of Saudi Arabia, when he was the deputy crown prince, gave an interview several months back and he said—and I think I’ve got the quote roughly right—that we won’t wait for the battle to be in Saudi Arabia. Instead we will work so the battle is in Iran, not in Saudi Arabia.

What did you understand him to mean by that?

5- HAASS: But just following up on what the crown and the deputy crown prince said, are you worried that—the fact that you and Saudis and others are on opposite sides of the conflict in Yemen, could one way or another lead to direct confrontation?

6- HAASS: You mentioned Syria, so let me turn to that.

You yourselves have been the victims of the use of chemical weapons. Now you find yourself supporting and embedding a government that’s using chemical weapons. How is it you square that?

7- HAASS: Do you have serious doubts whether the Syrian government used chemicals weapons?

8- HAASS: OK. I’m not going to do some follow ups, so I want to say some other issues out there and then I want to open it up. Just this past week, we marked the second anniversary of the U.S., not just U.S., but the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the JCPOA, the multilateral agreement on the Iranian nuclear program.

I guess I have two questions. One is, what is your assessment of compliance up to date? I don’t expect you to assess your own, some people here might have some views on that. I’m curious, your assessment of the compliance of others, particularly the United States.

9-HAASS: You’re talking about sanctions, for example, dealing with terrorism or human rights or other such issues.

10- HAASS: Secretary Tillerson, I think, again, I’ve got the quote roughly right, recently called for, quote, “supporting elements inside Iran that would lead to a peaceful transition of the Iranian government.” And several American senators have been less diplomatic and have called for regime change. So my question is, how do you hear that? And what impact does it have on how you see the United States?

11- HAASS: Let me raise a few other questions. One, there was a New York Times story over the weekend I’m sure you saw, essentially arguing that Iran now dominates in Iraq, thanks to a U.S. policy. And we’ve seen in Iraq several times where you had a government nominally in charge and then alienated Sunnis, who formed al-Qaida, ISIS, what have you.

Whether Iran dominates Iraq or not will make a debating point. Iran clearly has significant influence in Iraq.

What confidence do you have that this—that history won’t repeat itself, that Shi’a militia and then basically a Shi’a-dominated government won’t overreach and whatever they call it—you know, that some version of Sunni terrorism 3.0 won’t emerge just like ISIS and al-Qaida did? What confidence do you have there?

12- HAASS: Do you believe that there’s a place for American forces in Iraq?

13- HAASS: But you have foreign—you have Iranian forces in Syria. Why are American forces in Iraq not destabilizing—Iranian forces in Syria not—

14- HAASS: You mentioned the Kurds. Late in September, there’s a vote, as you know, to be taken by the Kurds in Iraq. I don’t have a crystal ball, but I’m mildly confident they will vote for a state of their own, to that effect. You’ve obviously got a significant Kurdish population in your own country. There’s significant Kurdish populations elsewhere, including Turkey and Syria. What is—what is the Iranian government’s view towards Kurdish self-determination?

15- HAASS: Would you qualify Turkish policies as anti-Kurdish?

16- HAASS: Two last questions, in that case, analytically. The United States is considering introducing additional forces into Afghanistan. From your country’s perspective, this would be with the acceptance or at the request of the government. Would—is this something that you believe will make it more likely that Afghanistan will be able to wind down the civil war and forge a peace agreement?

17- HAASS: And my last question before I open it up. Over the weekend there were new reports about Americans in detention in Iran, one receiving a 10-year sentence, a student at Princeton. There’s a number of other Americans or Iranian-Americans who are also being detained in Iranian prisons.

Is Iran prepared to release these people as a humanitarian gesture? What possible good is served by having these people under questionable, to say the least, charges serve long prison sentences in Iran?

18- HAASS: Have you had any signals one way or the other from the Trump administration that’s now been in office for six months that lead you to believe that there’s anything new, either positive or negative, to be introduced?

19- HAASS: In all modesty.

20- HAASS: You mentioned the JCPOA. Just to be clear, in eight years, just to choose one provision, all limits on centrifuge quantity and quality expire. Has your government—and in 10 years limits on stockpile quantity and quality expire. Has your government made any decisions or statements about what Iran’s intentions would be after these ceilings expire?

21- HAASS: Just given that, has the Iranian government articulated a position on North Korea? Because at the moment it is busy expanding both its nuclear as well as its missile inventory.

22- HAASS: Just to be clear, you wouldn’t support, or you don’t support the use of sanctions against Russia for its occupation of Crimea?

23- HAASS: Minister Zarif, thank you for being with us for the last hour here today. I’d ask, again, people to please remain in their seats. But, Mr. Minister, thank you. (Applause.)

https://www.cfr.org/event/conversation-mohammad-javad-zarif